Thanks to all of those who attended the Imulus 3rd Thursday presentation on HTML5 last night. We had some great discussion and topic review. Today we’ve placed the presentation website live at http://html5.imulus.com.

Here are the additional links that got mentioned during the meetup.

• The League of Movable Type
• Font Squirrel @fontface typefaces
• Hot Shoo imagery
• Border Radius quick grab site
• CSS 3 generator / quick code creation
• HTML5 for Web Designers — A logic and semantic based review of HTML5

This should be everything that was covered, however, if you find something missing feel free to add a comment with a link. We’ll jump on it ASAP.

Updates: A few more HTML5 resources in the list.

In the spirit of my post about the HOME button, I’ve also decided to take on the question of linking visitors from site A –> B. It’s my honest belief that a website shouldn’t trap the user by tossing all external links into a new browser window. To my surprise when I posted this question question to the LinkedIN community an overwhelming number of comments were in favor of popping up new windows for any links which take the user outside of the main site.

I believe I can break web users into two major groups;

Shorties – Those who are savvy and understand how to use shortcuts.

Mousers – Those who rely only on left-mouse clicks and are still learning how to use the right mouse button.

I don’t believe we should cater to the Mousers. There is a browser back button for a reason; to return you to the page you were just on. I’m not buying the bullshit argument that users will click on a link and forget how to get back to your site. I do however think that when you force new windows upon the user you run a greater risk of the user closing your site, in which case they lose the ability to click BACK.

Let’s just agree to keep it consistent and stop the madness of new browser windows UNLESS the user willingly right-clicks or opens them in a new tab…..by choice.

What drives you?

Being really good at what I do, staying on the leading edge of the industry, and having an impact on people who see/use my work. Too many people stagnate, if I ever start stagnating I want to be taken out back behind the chemical shed and ended.

When not by your computer, where might we find you on a Friday night?

There’s about a 95% chance I’ll be with friends, a 90% chance I’ll be up past 2 A.M., a 70% chance that I’ll be out on the town, and a 50% chance that at some point during the evening I’ll drink a great glass of scotch. Other possibilities include: beating people at Halo, playing pool, chess, or watching amazing movies like No Country For Old Men.

What’s more important loyalty, honesty or passion?

If it’s just one thing I think it has to be honesty. At least if someone is honest you know right away if they will be loyal or not.

Still I’d say ideally it’s a blend of all three. Passion is incredibly important to me, and therefore I need to see it from other people from time to time. If they don’t have passion chances are I won’t associate with them for too long.

If you were a rockstar, who would you be?

I’d like to say Zack de la Rocha from Rage Against the Machine. He has a cause, he has a path he wants to follow, and he does it. The truth though is I don’t think many people could be Zack, even me, so I’d have to say Jon Bon Jovi. He seems nice, he’s into sports, and he knows how to rock it out.

Barack Obama, Steve Jobs, Tiger Woods or John Gruber? Which would you most want to grab beer with and why?

Steve Jobs terrifies the shit out of me. And while I’d love to pick his brain about his approach I think I’d just sit there being nervous. Obama I think I could actually open up to and have a good discussion with. He seems like he’d really listen and take ideas to heart, not to mention tell you when he thinks you’re wrong.

Barack is definitely my choice.

If Internet Explorer was a human and you were alone with it in a room for 30 minutes what would you say or do during that time?

There’s a very very high possibility that after I got the limbs off I’d eat them. Except IE8, I assume IE8 would join me in the feast.

Your bachelor pad is on fire, what are you grabbing as you leap out the window and race down the fire escape?

iPhone. It’d be the fastest way to get ahold of people and figure out the situation. Plus think of all the great tweets you could write.

“My house just burned down, fucking crazy. Want to grab a burger? – twitpic.com/holyfire”

*note: if I had a dog I’d take her instead of the phone.

What rules or general principles guide your coding or interface design?

I guess I look at the whole experience and what I really appreciate when using something. Sometimes you run into a site or concept that is just mind blowingly good and you think to yourself, “wow, someone really refined and nailed that, I should strive to do that in what I do.” That doesn’t mean I always achieve that level, but I’m constantly trying.

Give me a joke. Don’t hold back.

How do you make a baby cry twice? Hahaha, just kidding I’m not going to give that punch line on our blog.

Instead let’s go with: “How many Chuck Norris’ does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None. Chuck Norris likes to kill in the dark.”

What 3 things are you afraid of?

1. I’m terrified of death. Hence the reason I don’t drive with Scott often.
2. I’m really afraid of losing a coding finger. Especially to the garbage disposal.
3. I’m afraid of Kat’s raptor impression.

What 3 things could you improve on?

1. When I learn the most is when I do things on my own and don’t have people show me. I get too reliant on people around me from time to time.
2. I could be more conscientious of how my actions and approach effect other people. I think I know how I’m perceived but I’m sure I miss things.
3. I’d like to be more well read in other areas besides geek topics. I find people with a vast knowledge and cultural background to be fascinating.

What 5 artist are on your iPod right now?

• Rage Against the Machine
• Michael Jackson
• Dj Vernimal
• Brian Transeau
• Abdominal

If I could grant you one super-power what would it be?

The ability to read and grasp information 200x faster than I do right now.

What current trend just baffles you?

Girls wearing abnormally massive sunglasses. What is the fucking deal with that? Do they think covering their entire face with fake plastic gold plated glasses is attractive in any way?

Fill this in. I can’t believe I didn’t get tossed in jail for ____?

Using the blink tag.

* you could also replace blink tag with “spacer gif” and it’d be equally as hideous and revolting.

If you were a pro-wrestler, what would be your name?

It’d definitely be Pyrodeath. I mean… there’s no way I couldn’t name myself Pyrodeath. I’d light my pants on fire right before my final move of the match. It’d be seriously epic.

Today I posted this question to LinkedIN and I was floored by both the speed and the detail of the responses. Informally surveying the responses I’d say most are in favor of the HOME button call out in the main navigation.

Here’s a highlight of some of the responses.

• Sometimes clicking on the logo takes you home and sometimes it does not.
• I click on “home” links quite frequently, especially in bread crumbs.
• I personally don’t even look for a home button, though I do like breadcrumb navigation links.
• I got 4 blank stares from the very educated 30 to 50 year old normal web users in the room. “Clicking a site’s logo takes you to the homepage?” one of them asked me. Which was justification enough for me to keep the nav button.
• Maybe 20% of users are aware of the logo-as-home-link standard.
• On rare occasions I’ll use if it’s there.
• I don’t think everyone is aware that the logo goes to the site home and in any case one of the most frustrating things about many sites is that you have to *think* to navigate.

What to do?
Andy Bosselman said it best “look to the leaders”, so I did. I looked at usability leaders and well-known sites and the results were mixed.

Using It

AdaptivePath

Nielsen Norman Group

37Signals Basecamp

Adobe

There’s No Place for Home

Microsoft

Apple

Amazon

The Verdict
Clearly, there isn’t a standard that is widely accepted on the top-tier sites. In our case, for the last few years we really have restrained from using the HOME button unless the client specifically has requested it. Based on the responses and discussions within the office we’ve arrived at a decision. We’ll include the HOME option in the navigation as long as the navigation isn’t overcrowded. It just appears that the logo-clicking standard has a long way to go before it is widely accepted.

Google just recently posted an article talking about their opinion on dynamic vs. static URLs. In short, Google is saying that dynamically created URLs from a content management system, i.e. URLs that contain information talking to a database such as:

/media_review.php?user_id=25&article_id=315

should be left as is instead of rewriting them to look cleaner (static):

/media-review/bruce/dnc-ratm-concert/

Here’s a direct quote from their blog post on the topic:

Does that mean I should avoid rewriting dynamic URLs at all?
That’s our recommendation, unless your rewrites are limited to removing unnecessary parameters, or you are very diligent in removing all parameters that could cause problems. If you transform your dynamic URL to make it look static you should be aware that we might not be able to interpret the information correctly in all cases… …if you’re using URL rewriting (rather than making a copy of the content) to produce static-looking URLs from a dynamic site, you could be doing harm rather than good.

The problem is that Google seems to be making a recommendation on what is best for their search engine crawling and not what is best for the user or web usability in general. There is no debate, URL rewriting makes websites easier to use. It makes people understand what they will be looking at when they visit a link, and in general provides clearer information than dynamic URLs. For instance, here on our blog you can see all of my posts by going to http://blog.imulus.com/bruce the url is clear and easy to understand. If you want to see all my posts for a certain category you can do this http://blog.imulus.com/bruce/css. This functionality makes logical sense. Websites with extremely complicated URL calls can utilize rewriting to help their viewers better understand where they are on the site. And in regard to marketing materials — the time I see a company willing to use a url with ?id=237 at the end for a marketing or advertising campaign will be my first.

The fact is this, URL rewriting is an extremely useful tool (ironically Google’s blog post about dynamic rewrites uses rewriting for the URL). And while certain rewrite schemes may hide data that Google would like to parse, that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t use rewriting. The idea that a usable standard should be changed just to make Google’s web crawling better is ludicrous. Google throughout their history of search has continuously accommodated for changing website methods. By stating that URL rewrites are improper Google is taking a strike at one of the best standards to come out of Web 2.0. They’re suggesting a machine’s readability is more important than a human’s. And guess what: they’re dead wrong.