About Us

Bulletpoint StarImulus® is a technology focused design + interactive agency.

In addition to our client services we also have a few products in the works. Our office is always filled with chatter and this blog is an outlet for our creative energy, rants and ideas.

Podium

StacksStacks ®
A group task management solution that finally makes sense.

Sign Up For A Free Trial »

Featured Project

Sep18

The Democrat’s Failure to Brand

Let me start out by saying that I would call myself an independent as politics go. This isn’t about who’s right about this issue or that. As a design professional I am just struck by Democratic party’s continued inability to understand the power of branding. I cannot think of a single coherent message or brand that the Democratic party has articulated in the last decade or more. The Republicans, on the other hand, appear to have this mastered. If I asked 20 people on the street what the Republican party was about I would probably hear very similar things: “They’re about family values.” “They believe in lower taxes and smaller government.” “Strong military.”

Whether you agree with these policies or not, they are consistent and haven’t really changed in decades. Repeated over and over by Republican candidates in hundreds of campaigns around the country. Just as powerful as how they have branded themselves is how they have branded the Democrats. “Tax and spend.” “Elitists, out of touch with regular folks.” “Big government.”

While these messages may or may not be true (The Republicans say they are for smaller government and lower spending, they have increased government spending at a historic rate over the last 8 years) people remember and believe them because they are so consistent.

Recent events show the Democrat’s continued inability to use this powerful tool. With the recent failures of financial institutions brought on by the sub-prime mortgage industry, is there any better time for the Democrats to rebrand the Republican party? The most basic branding of the Republican party is “conservative.” Over the last 8 years the Republicans have presided over an economy that has been anything but conservative. The word that comes to mind is reckless. If the Democrats would seize the opportunity to brand the republicans as “Reckless” they might be able to turn the Republican’s own branding against itself. A reckless party can’t have very good values. Would you trust your tax dollars to someone who is reckless? Trust them with the military?

As I said, I’m not saying either party is right or better, it’s just interesting to watch the campaign from the perspective of marketing and branding.

posted in: failures, opinion

This post was published on Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 10:56 pm

Leave a comment


Comments

1

Bruce

September 19, 2008 at 10:40 am

Scott, great post here. I agree. Especially in the 2004 election the Dems didn’t capitalize on the potential they had to brand. Even now, the party feels slightly out of touch from their ideals. People do have trouble picking exactly what it is that dems stand for, besides “more taxes” even if it’s not true.

However, I would argue that Obama, without of the help of his party, has found a brand. Change. So much so that it’s even been taken on by the McCain camp in recent weeks. Obama has succeeded in a clear idea behind his campaign. His identity seems solidified as a young politician hoping to rejuvenating the way Washington works fundamentally. He stands behind that, and doesn’t bend away from the criticism of experience, rather he gives reasons that he can channel that inexperience into a new direction.

This is what the democratic party should do as a whole. Clarify what they are for and be willing to stand up to critics instead of dodging around trying to please people, losing their identity along the way.

I’m hopeful as a dem. that if Obama can squeeze out an election win that his branding success will filter down to the rest of the party.

2

Scott

September 19, 2008 at 1:23 pm

I agree that to an extent, Obama has defined a brand for himself of a young politician who wants to change how Washington works. However, “change” is not a sustainable brand for the party. If Obama wins and is president for the next 8 years, the next Democratic nominee cannot run on “change.”

3

Greg Lynott

September 24, 2008 at 10:45 am

I have to agree. I think part of the “problem” is that Democrat’s are too polite. The other part is the ability of Republicans to stick to their story even when emerging facts fly in the face of their stated positions.
Professor George Lakoff from UC Berkeley has done brilliant work in the study of political language. Here’s the Wikipedia link for Lakoff if you are interested in learning more about him and his thoughts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lakoff